Beats 360
Beats · Fitness headphones · Model MJE14LL/A (Apple Store SKU, Cloud with Cloud Performance Knit Cushions); MJE34 in the Beats product URL · First generation · Variant: Four frame colours - Black, Cloud, Sky and Pink - with Performance Knit or UltraPlush cushions · Markets: US, GB, DE, AU
Beats' first IPX4 over-ear with replaceable, washable cushions, as 11 qualifying reviews from 9 editorial groups saw it: the best gym over-ear yet, at USD 349.99 with no wired audio.
Verdict
Reviewers agree the Beats 360 is the first credible pair of over-ear headphones built for the gym: an IPX4 rating, twist-off ear and headband cushions that Beats sells as spare parts, and a fit that held through a 10-mile run. Every group that measured comfort or stability praised it, and ZDNET gives it 4.3/5 with an Editors' Choice. The split is sound and value. WIRED scores 7/10 and says the midrange feels scooped out, The Verge calls the midrange a wash of sound and prefers a cheaper Sony, and every group notes there is no wired or lossless listening even though the cheaper Studio Pro offers both. Battery is rated at 32 hours and mostly exceeds it, but ecoustics measured a drain while the headphones were powered off.
Why medium confidence: 9 independent editorial groups. Score spread (standard deviation) of 7.1 points. Reviewers disagree on a decisive attribute: Sound quality, Value. Open alerts indicate the evidence may change soon. Only 8 of 9 independent groups publish a numeric score.
* Affiliate link: we may earn a commission. It does not affect our scores. Compare all 2 offers
What reviewers agree on
- Noise cancelling · praised by 7 of 9 sources
Which sources said this
- Tom's Guide — positive: The benefit over in-ear and open-ear buds is the great sound quality and active noise cancellation the over-ear design provides, most apparent outside workouts.
- ZDNET — positive: The 360 with Knit cushions cancel noise, especially voices and higher-pitched noises such as clattering weights, better than the Beats Studio Pro with UltraPlush cushions.
- ecoustics — positive: Noise cancelling is excellent for the money, testing just a notch or two below top models like the Bose QC Ultra Gen 2 and Sony WH-1000XM6; ANC sub-score 4.25/5.
- Engadget — mixed: These headphones do a good job with constant noise sources like white noise machines, but like most of the competition, they don't offer much relief from human voices.
- How-To Geek — positive: ANC is strong: it will not rival the AirPods Max 2 or Bose QuietComfort Ultra in raw isolation, but it is excellent for the money and a better bargain.
- Macwelt — positive: ANC works impeccably, so much so that you hear the blood pulsing in your ears with no music playing, though a quiet hiss appears next to the AirPods Max 2.
- SoundGuys — mixed: They can silence the hum of an air conditioner, but won't completely drown out voices or higher-frequency sounds; many over-ears have better ANC, though most cost more.
- The Verge — positive: Noise-cancelling performance is very good, not as silent as the Bose Ultra Headphones Gen 2, but enough to block out leafblowers and gym chatter.
- WIRED — positive: While not as strong as flagship headphones from Sony or Bose, the Beats 360 are close enough, and did a good job shushing coworkers, cafes and subway cars.
- Comfort and fit · praised by 7 of 9 sources
Which sources said this
- Tom's Guide — positive: With traditional glasses or sunglasses there is some pressure where the arms are pushed in by the headphones; a cord-arm frame avoided it.
- ZDNET — positive: Worn with the Knit cushions to the gym three times, the reviewer noticed less heat build-up in the earcups and less sweat in and around the ears after workouts.
- ecoustics — positive: Still relatively heavy at nearly 300 grams, but the balanced design fits well and remained comfortable for hours of wear, with a comfort sub-score of 4/5.
- Engadget — negative: The whole setup is surprisingly lightweight, but similar to previous Beats headphones, the clamping force becomes uncomfortable if you have a larger head like I do.
- How-To Geek — positive: The exercise-friendly knitted cups looked great on a white review unit, even if they make large ears slightly sore over extended periods; UltraPlush is easier for work.
- Macwelt — positive: As a glasses wearer he wore the 360 for up to five hours at a time without discomfort: the clamping force and soft Performance Knit cushions work well on a large head.
- SoundGuys — positive: The 360 weigh 294.5 g and are heavier than the Studio Pro, but the light headband makes them more comfortable; the tight UltraPlush seal plus ANC pressure can hurt.
- The Verge — positive: The headphones have decent clamping force to keep them secure during most workout movements, but after a few hours of non-workout use the knit pads make the side of the head itchy.
- WIRED — negative: In everyday use the slightly strong clamping force switches from a pro to a con: they get uncomfortable to wear after a few hours of office work.
- Sweat and water resistance · praised by 6 of 9 sources
Which sources said this
- Tom's Guide — negative: The pads were damp with sweat after the 10-miler and took about five hours to dry; the reviewer worries how long-term workout use affects headphones rated only IPX4.
- ZDNET — positive: Beats rated the 360 at IPX4, so they can withstand particularly sweaty workouts or bouts of rain during a run, which counterparts from Sony, Bose and Sennheiser cannot claim.
- ecoustics — positive: IPX4 water resistance and diamond-knit earcups that work reasonably well for workouts; the cons list no manual EQ or line-in playback and the odd power-off drain.
- Engadget — positive: The company offers the additional perk of IPX4 sweat and water resistance, which is not on many over-ear headphone spec sheets.
- How-To Geek — positive: They have IPX4 sweat and water resistance, which makes the reviewer far more confident wearing these for workouts.
- SoundGuys — positive: The Performance Knit cushions are more comfortable and better at wicking moisture away, which is crucial because the Beats 360 are IPX4 water-resistant.
- The Verge — positive: The knit ear cups wicked moisture away well for both reviewers; IPX4 is the minimum rating recommended for workout headphones, though both pairs were wet and icky after exercise.
- Repairability and parts · praised by 5 of 9 sources
Which sources said this
- ZDNET — positive: The headband padding is removable as well as the ear cushions, so sweat-wicking material can be used over the head during exercise; an extra kit takes the total to $400.
- ecoustics — positive: Easily swappable earcups and headband cushions; the ratings give Build Quality 3/5 and Value 3/5, with Performance also 3/5.
- How-To Geek — positive: Ear cups and headband can be quickly replaced for a fresh look or to swap out sweaty gym pads, which the reviewer says helps longevity by delaying replacement.
- Macwelt — positive: The headband cushion pushes in and the ear cushions twist on, orientation-independent; without the ear cushions fitted the headphones refuse to work and the power button blinks red.
- The Verge — mixed: They also have a replaceable battery, although there currently isn't any documentation about the process or pricing for the replacement battery; the ear cups clean separately.
- WIRED — positive: Making the ear cups and headband easy to remove makes them easier to clean and replace, a headache with most other headphones, which the reviewer calls crucial for exercise.
- Connectivity · praised by 7 of 9 sources
Which sources said this
- T3 — positive: One-touch pairing, iCloud pairing, Automatic Switching, Audio Sharing, Find My and hands-free Siri on Apple; Fast Pair, Audio Switch, Find Hub and the Beats app on Android.
- ZDNET — positive: Android users can see the 360 in their Find Hub, with Google Fast Pair support and the Beats app, alongside hands-free Siri, Find My and Automatic Device Switching for iOS users.
- ecoustics — positive: Both Android and iOS users get one-touch pairing, audio switching between connected devices and finder functionality, with no manual EQ or line-in playback.
- Engadget — positive: On iOS you get one-touch and iCloud pairing, automatic switching, Audio Sharing, hands-free Siri and Find My; Android gets fast pairing, ecosystem pairing, Find Hub and the Beats app.
- How-To Geek — positive: Unlike the AirPods Max 2, the 360 have full Android support: the reviewer used an iPhone but could just as easily have paired them with a OnePlus 15 with few compromises.
- Macwelt — negative: The headphones use Bluetooth 5.3 but support only the SBC and AAC codecs; high-resolution codecs such as Qualcomm's aptX or Sony's LDAC are not supported.
- SoundGuys — mixed: Exclusively Bluetooth 5.3 with AAC and SBC only: no aptX or LDAC, no Auracast, though Apple one-touch pairing and Google Fast Pair are supported.
- The Verge — positive: On Apple devices the 360 support one-touch pairing, iCloud pairing, automatic switching, audio sharing, Find My and hands-free Siri; Android gets fast pairing, account-wide pairing and Find Hub.
- WIRED — positive: The 360s pair instantly with Apple devices and support Apple device swapping, Find My and Siri; on Android you get fast pairing, Google's Find Hub and the stand-alone Beats app.
- Battery life · praised by 6 of 9 sources
Which sources said this
- T3 — mixed: Up to 32 hours with ANC and Personalised Spatial Audio enabled, though T3 found Transparency mode drains the headphones faster and can empty the battery in 24 hours.
- CNET — positive: It is rated for up to 32 hours of playback at moderate volume with noise cancelling on, which is eight hours better than the Studio Pro's battery life.
- ecoustics — negative: Battery life is rated at 32 hours and matched testing, but the battery continued to drain after the headphones were powered down, at around 0.5 percent per hour.
- Engadget — positive: After 24 hours of testing, the review unit still had 47 percent left, so the headphones are on track to blow past the stated 32-hour longevity.
- How-To Geek — positive: The battery life is frankly epic: Beats claims 32 hours with ANC on, and the reviewer could easily go days between charges.
- Macwelt — positive: Beats rates 32 hours, but with head tracking off and ANC on Macwelt measured well over 40 hours before charging at about 20 percent remaining.
- SoundGuys — positive: Rated for 32 hours of playback with ANC or Adaptive EQ active; on a nearly six-hour flight with ANC on, the headphones used only 14 percent of the battery.
- WIRED — positive: With ANC enabled you get 32 hours of battery life, which the reviewer calls very strong.
Common criticisms
- Wired listening · criticized by 5 of 9 sources
Which sources said this
- T3 — negative: The reviewer dearly misses the cabled-in option that made the Beats Studio Pro excellent for long-haul flights; the 360 has no wired listening at all.
- ZDNET — negative: The 360 headphones don't support 3.5 mm or USB-C wired audio; the reviewer attributes the omission to the water resistance, since the USB-C port is used for charging.
- Engadget — negative: The Beats 360 doesn't even support wired listening, let alone lossless audio over USB-C, and there is no wear detection for automatic pausing either.
- Macwelt — negative: The Beats 360 cannot transmit audio over a cable at all, and neither the iPhone settings nor the Android Beats app offers an equalizer.
- SoundGuys — negative: The inbuilt USB-C port is only for charging: there is no USB audio support and no 3.5 mm jack, so the Beats 360 cannot be used over a cable at all.
Where reviewers disagree
- Sound quality
· 4 positive, 2 negative, 3 mixed
Which sources said this
- Tom's Guide — positive: The sound quality is great, and the transparency mode keeps you aware, though wind noise is not filtered well when running outdoors.
- ZDNET — mixed: A critical ear will likely not enjoy the 360's sound profile: they are bass-forward, though not nearly as much as previous models, and emphasise higher frequencies.
- ecoustics — positive: Sound quality is generally balanced, the bass is musical and well controlled, and the treble is brighter than the Sony XM6, though it lacks the same definition.
- Engadget — positive: There is definitely powerful bass here, but subtle details, like the texture of distorted guitars and synths, add layers to tracks other headphones might compress away.
- How-To Geek — positive: The Beats 360 sound quality is such an improvement over previous models, such as the Studio Pro, that they are arguably some of the best wireless headphones on the market.
- Macwelt — mixed: The lows are warm but tend to overlay the lower mids; the highs are pleasantly detailed in a modern mix, but some records sound shrill, and there is no equalizer at all.
- SoundGuys — mixed: With ANC or transparency mode on, the Beats 360 heavily over-emphasises the bass, so kick drums and bass lines crowd out quieter details; the Off mode's Adaptive EQ reins the bass in.
- The Verge — negative: The bass sounds nice and supportive and the high end is mostly clear, but the midrange is a wash of sound: for $350 the reviewer prefers the Sony XM5.
- WIRED — negative: They sound OK, but not for headphones that cost $350; listening on the Beats 360 feels like someone scooped out the midrange, with guitars and vocals weak or lost.
- Value
· 3 positive, 1 negative, 5 mixed
Which sources said this
- Tom's Guide — positive: If you prefer to use over-ear cans for everything, Tom's Guide says the Beats 360 are the best running headphones you can get.
- ZDNET — mixed: The 360 has the noise cancellation and 32-hour battery life expected at its $350 price point, and purchasing cushion kits is an additional expense.
- ecoustics — negative: Value is scored 3 out of 5: the reviewer calls the power-off battery drain the biggest issue and says it makes the 360 tough to recommend based on his testing.
- Engadget — positive: Cushion Kits will cost you $50, and Engadget concludes Beats built a solid set of headphones under $400, an added bonus in today's financial climate.
- How-To Geek — positive: The $350 asking price makes them a better deal than the AirPods Max 2, and Beats headphones often go on sale, so the 360 may undercut rivals before long.
- Macwelt — mixed: Beats charges EUR 349.95, EUR 50 more than the Studio Pro and still EUR 220 cheaper than the AirPods Max 2; a cushion kit costs another EUR 60, or EUR 10 during the launch offer.
- SoundGuys — mixed: The $350 price is a bit steep considering the audio compromises, and SoundGuys expects discounts to bring them to a $300 sweet spot; the Studio Pro remains the cheaper alternative.
- The Verge — mixed: A hard case would have been preferred at this price; the reviewer says they are not a first choice for everyday listening but would grab a pair for the gym.
- WIRED — mixed: At $350 they are significantly cheaper than AirPods Max, but the Sonos Ace and Bose QuietComfort cost about the same and sound better, lacking only the fitness chops.
Attribute by attribute
Bars show how many independent sources were positive, mixed or negative. A number appears only when sources published a score for that attribute — we never invent one.
What buyers report
Buyer comments frequently mention:
- Listing is new and the sample is small: the badge reads New on Amazon in past month and only 43 ratings exist
- 28% of all ratings are one or two stars against 41% at five stars, a genuinely polarised sample
What creators showed
Best for
- Gym and studio users who want one pair of over-ears instead of earbuds plus a second pair. SoundGuys writes that if you want one pair for almost everything, you should not be afraid to grab the Beats 360, and ZDNET says the water resistance plus cushion swapping effectively create two headphones in one.
- People who sweat heavily and want a contact surface they can actually clean. Apple's own cleaning guide covers removing the cushions and hand-washing them, and Beats sells replacement Cushion Kits from USD 9.99 during the launch offer instead of a paid repair.
- Buyers who live in both Apple and Android ecosystems. T3, Engadget and How-To Geek all name one-touch or fast pairing, Find My or Find Hub and automatic switching on both platforms as the reason to choose the Beats 360 over the AirPods Max 2.
Skip it if
- You want the best sound at this price. WIRED says they sound OK but not for headphones that cost USD 350, and WIRED, The Verge and ecoustics all prefer cheaper Sony, Bose or Sonos models on sound quality alone.
- You need wired or lossless listening. SoundGuys, CNET, Engadget, ZDNET, T3, WIRED, How-To Geek and Macwelt all record that the USB-C port is charging only, while the cheaper Beats Studio Pro keeps both USB-C audio and a 3.5 mm jack.
- You wear headphones at a desk for hours. WIRED and The Verge both report the strong clamping force becoming uncomfortable after a few hours, and T3 reports heat build-up under both cushion materials.
- You want automatic pause, a custom EQ or a hard case. There is no wear detection and no equalizer on either platform, and the box holds only a soft woven case.
- Battery replacement is unresolved and must stay NOT CONFIRMED: The Verge reports a replaceable battery but states there is currently no documentation about the process or pricing, Beats' product page does not mention one, and Apple only lists Beats battery service. The Verge's line is recorded as PROBABLE, never as a user-replaceable part.
- The sound split is real, not a rounding effect. How-To Geek calls them arguably some of the best wireless headphones on the market and ZDNET rates them 4.3/5, while WIRED reports a scooped-out midrange and The Verge describes the midrange as a wash of sound and prefers the Sony XM5 at the same price.
- Wired audio is the one unanimous loss: no 3.5 mm jack and no USB audio, so the Beats 360 cannot play lossless over a cable, and the cheaper Beats Studio Pro can do both. ZDNET links the omission to the IPX4 sealing.
- Battery measurements disagree in both directions. Beats rates 32 hours; Macwelt measured well over 40 hours and Engadget still had 47 percent after 24 hours, but T3 measured Transparency mode emptying the battery in 24 hours and ecoustics measured about 0.5 percent per hour draining while the headphones were powered off.
- IPX4 is verified but bounded. Apple states the Beats 360 are sweat and water resistant and not waterproof or sweatproof, that the protection can diminish with normal wear and cannot be resealed, and that the headphones must not go in a washing machine or dryer; Tom's Guide saw the knit cushions take about five hours to dry after a 10-mile run.
- Buyer Signal is thin and does not corroborate the editorial scores: Amazon US shows 3.5/5 from only 43 global ratings with 28 percent of them at two stars or fewer, and no second platform could be read because Best Buy timed out and Amazon UK and DE returned HTTP 404.
- Owner hygiene matters here. Ziff Davis owns CNET, ZDNET and Mashable; Future plc owns T3, Tom's Guide and TechRadar; Valnet owns How-To Geek and XDA; and Yahoo hosts four syndicated Beats 360 pages. The quorum is nine independent groups behind seventeen review pages, never seventeen groups.
- The USD 349.99 price is already moving. Amazon US listed USD 349.00 on 2026-10-04, CNET and How-To Geek both expect street prices to fall, and the USD 49.99 Cushion Kit is USD 9.99 only until 31 October 2026 while stocks last.
- Repairability is partial rather than solved: cushions are a genuine user-replaceable part sold by Beats, but the earcup housings and headband are not, and Macwelt notes that with the ear cushions removed the headphones refuse to power on and the power button blinks red.
- Relevant publications were lost to access failures rather than to a lack of reviews: AppleInsider, Trusted Reviews, Wareable, StereoNET, TechRepublic and others returned HTTP 403, USA TODAY returned HTTP 402, Digital Trends returned HTTP 405, and tomsguide.com did not resolve, so its review was read at its Future-syndicated URL.
Alternatives
| Product | Quorum Score | Confidence | Note | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sony WF-1000XM6 | 84/100 | Medium | WIRED, The Verge and ecoustics all name Sony's 1000X line as the better-sounding, similarly priced alternative to the Beats 360; the WF-1000XM6 is its in-ear flagship in this database, so the comparison is about sound per dollar rather than form factor. | Compare |
| Shokz OpenFit 2+ | 82/100 | Medium | Tom's Guide's 10-mile Beats 360 test ends with the reviewer returning to open earbuds for running, naming Shokz among his favourites; the OpenFit 2 Plus is the open-ear pick already analysed here, with more awareness and a less sweaty fit. | Compare |
Sources analyzed
| Publication | Type | Published | Original | Normalized | Status | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yahoo Tech
by Jon Fingas |
Full review | Oct 1, 2026 | No score | — | Republication — counted once | Read ↗ |
| How-To Geek
by Jon Fingas Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Oct 1, 2026 | 8.5/10 | 85/100 | Counted | Read ↗ |
| SoundGuys
by Brady Snyder Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Sep 30, 2026 | 7.3/10 | 73/100 | Counted | Read ↗ |
| Tom's Guide
by Nick Harris-Fry Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Sep 29, 2026 | No score | — | Counted · averaged within its group | Read ↗ |
| WIRED
by Harry Rabinowitz Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Sep 29, 2026 | 7/10 | 70/100 | Counted | Read ↗ |
| Yahoo Tech
by Mike Snider |
First impressions | Sep 24, 2026 | No score | — | First impressions — context only | Read ↗ |
| ecoustics
by Ryan Waniata Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Sep 24, 2026 | Sub-scores: Performance 3/5, Build Quality 3/5, Comfort 4/5, Features 4/5, ANC 4.25/5, Value 3/5 | — | Counted | Read ↗ |
| NeoTeo
by NeoTeo |
Roundup | Sep 24, 2026 | No score | — | Roundup — context only | Read ↗ |
| Macwelt
by Eugen Wegmann Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Sep 23, 2026 | 4.5/5 | 90/100 | Counted | Read ↗ |
| Mashable
by David Carnoy |
Full review | Sep 22, 2026 | No score | — | Republication — counted once | Read ↗ |
| Yahoo Tech
by Billy Steele |
Full review | Sep 22, 2026 | No score | — | Republication — counted once | Read ↗ |
| Yahoo Tech
by Jacob Krol |
News | Sep 22, 2026 | No score | — | News — context only | Read ↗ |
| CNET
by David Carnoy Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Sep 22, 2026 | 8.4/10 | 84/100 | Counted · averaged within its group | Read ↗ |
| Engadget
by Billy Steele Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Sep 22, 2026 | 8.2/10 | 82/100 | Counted | Read ↗ |
| T3
by Matt Kollat Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Sep 22, 2026 | 4/5 | 80/100 | Counted · averaged within its group | Read ↗ |
| The Verge
by John Higgins Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Sep 22, 2026 | 7/10 | 70/100 | Counted | Read ↗ |
| ZDNET
by Jada Jones Product provided by the brand |
Full review | Sep 22, 2026 | 4.3/5 | 86/100 | Counted · averaged within its group | Read ↗ |
Summaries are ours; read each original review for its full context. Normalized = the original score converted to 0–100.
How we reached this verdict
11 full professional reviews qualified, representing 9 independent editorial groups, published between Sep 2026 and Oct 2026. Each group counts once and weighs the same; when a group has several titles, their scores are averaged into one. Scores were converted linearly to a 0–100 scale, and the number rests on the 8 groups that publish one; reviews without a score inform the consensus but not the number. Buyer and creator signals are shown separately and are not averaged into the Quorum Score. Research cut-off: Oct 4, 2026. Methodology 1.1. Main limitation: only 8 of 9 independent groups publish a numeric score. Read the methodology.
Where to buy
We may earn a commission when you buy through links on this page. This does not affect our scores or editorial conclusions. How we make money.
* Affiliate link. Prices and stock change quickly; the date shows when we last checked.
Specifications
The Beats 360 is Beats' first over-ear headphone designed for exercise: announced on 22 September 2026 and on sale from 24 September 2026 at US$349.99 / GBP 299.95 / EUR 349.95 / AU$499.95. It is the first Beats over-ear with an IPX4 rating and the first with interchangeable ear and headband cushions, which Beats sells separately as Cushion Kits. The earcups are self-contained, each with its own battery, antenna and processor, which is how Beats kept the headband thin and made the water resistance possible. It sits alongside, not above, the Studio Pro, which stays on sale at a reduced US$299.99 and keeps both USB-C audio and a 3.5 mm jack. Adaptive EQ, Transparency, Personalized Spatial Audio with head tracking and Dolby Atmos are on board, but there is no equalizer, no wear detection and no wired playback.
| Form | Over-ear (circumaural) wireless headphone; true-wireless architecture with a separate battery, antenna and processor in each earcup |
|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.5 mm wide x 87.1 mm deep x 191.3 mm high (Beats spec sheet) |
| Weight | 294.5 g / 10.39 oz per Beats; reviews print 294.5 g and 295 g, and one TechRadar news piece prints 295.4 g |
| Chip | Beats custom-designed proprietary chip, fourth generation, one per earcup; not Apple's H2 |
| Drivers | Custom-designed 40 mm dual-magnet dynamic driver with triple-layer diaphragms and a custom high-dynamic-range amplifier; Beats claims 12 dB more output than the Studio Pro driver |
| Microphones | Nine total: eight for Active Noise Cancellation, three for voice pickup (two of them shared) |
| Sensors | Accelerometer and gyroscope, both in the left earcup, used for head-tracked audio; no wear-detection sensor |
| Noise cancelling | Active Noise Cancellation with Transparency mode; Beats claims 1.75x more total noise cancellation than the Studio Pro (vendor claim, not reproduced by any reviewer) |
| Audio features | Adaptive EQ (available only in the Off listening mode), Personalized Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking, Dolby Atmos, Audio Sharing |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.3; Apple one-touch and iCloud pairing, automatic switching, Find My, hands-free Siri; Android Fast Pair, audio switch, Find Hub and the Beats app |
| Codecs | AAC and SBC only; no aptX or LDAC and no Auracast |
| Wired audio | None. No 3.5 mm jack and no USB audio; the USB-C port is for charging only |
| Battery (rated) | Up to 32 hours of listening with ANC and Personalized Spatial Audio enabled; Fast Fuel gives up to 1 hour from a 5-minute charge |
| Water resistance | IPX4 under IEC 60529: sweat and water resistant, not waterproof or sweatproof, and not resealable or recheckable |
| Cushions | Interchangeable and detachable ear and headband cushions; Performance Knit included, UltraPlush sold separately; hand-washable with a soapy cloth, not machine washable |
| Cushion Kits (parts) | Sold by Beats as Interchangeable Replacement Ear and Head Cushions: USD 49.99 / GBP 49.95 / EUR 59.95 / AUD 49.95 list, introductory USD 9.99 / GBP 9.95 / EUR 9.95 / AUD 14.95 until 31 October 2026 |
| In the box | Headphones, colour-matched Performance Knit cushions and a woven ripstop fabric case; no USB-C cable, no power adapter and no sticker |
| Repairability | Cushions are a user-replaceable part sold by Beats; the battery is only offered through Apple's Beats battery service and no user procedure or price is documented, so user replacement is NOT CONFIRMED |
| Launch price | USD 349.99; GBP 299.95; EUR 349.95; AUD 499.95; Amazon US listed at USD 349.00 on 2026-10-04 |
| Availability | Announced 2026-09-22, on sale from 2026-09-24 at Beats, Apple and other retailers |
Update history
- · Verdict published — Verdict published: 11 qualifying reviews from 9 independent groups.