Verdict published

Sony Bravia 7 II

Sony ยท TVs ยท 2026 Bravia True RGB line, the step-down model below the flagship Bravia 9 II; replaces the 2024 Bravia 7 ยท Variant: 50, 55, 65, 75, 85 and 98 inches in the US (K-XX XR70M2); the same family is sold in Europe and the UK as XR75M2 ยท Markets: US, GB, DE, FR, PL, DK, IN

Sony's 2026 True RGB mid-ranger as 13 qualifying reviews from 12 editorial groups saw it: OLED-rivaling colour, blacks and brightness in a dark room, against weaker viewing angles, a glossy screen and a price that splits reviewers.

82 /100
ReviewQuorum verdict ยท derived from the sources

Verdict

Reviewers agree the Sony Bravia 7 II is 2026's most convincing mid-range LCD: its True RGB backlight is confirmed on this model by every publication read, and it buys colour volume, black uniformity and peak brightness that several reviewers call OLED-rivaling in a dark room. HIFI.DE scores it 9.2/10, Frandroid 9/10, TechRadar 4.5/5 and choose.tv 8.4/10, while CHIP's German school note stays out of the score. The dissent is WIRED's 6/10, which calls contrast and brightness average for the price. The recurring criticisms are price against cheaper OLEDs, weak viewing angles and blooming off-axis, a glossy screen, sound that needs a soundbar, and HDMI 2.1 on only two of four ports.

Quorum Score
82/100
Source Quorum
12 independent
6 publish a score
Quorum Confidence
Medium
Score range
60โ€“92
Last updated
Research cut-off
Oct 9, 2026

Why medium confidence: 12 independent editorial groups. Score spread (standard deviation) of 10.5 points. Reviewers disagree on a decisive attribute: Picture quality, HDR brightness, Gaming. Open alerts indicate the evidence may change soon. Only 6 of 12 independent groups publish a numeric score.

Where to buy
Best Buy US ยท Out of stock
$1,699.99 Sale price
Check price at Best Buy

Compare all 3 offers

Review Consensus ยท calculated by ReviewQuorum

What reviewers agree on

  • Smart TV platform ยท praised by 6 of 12 sources
    Which sources said this
    • HIFI.DE โ€” positive: Very good operation and connection options and a large selection of apps lead its pros list, ahead of the picture-quality caveats about reflection handling and dimming-zone size.
    • choose.tv โ€” positive: Apps score 9.6/10 and utility functions 9.4/10 on Google TV for the 2026 model year, the strongest part of the verdict.
    • Computer Bild โ€” positive: Runs Google TV on an Android basis with a cross-provider watchlist and the 2026 interface; no smart-platform criticism appears in the test.
    • Computerworld (DK) โ€” mixed: Heavy setup but smart control: first-time configuration is both a little heavy and very detailed, with a built-in microphone for voice commands.
    • Digit โ€” positive: Google TV runs with an XR processor with AI upscaling, XR motion clarity and X-Wide Angle Pro viewing on the India-market 55-inch K-55XR70M2.
    • Popular Mechanics โ€” neutral: The specification box lists Google TV with Wi-Fi 6E, Apple AirPlay 2 and Google Chromecast on a True RGB Mini-LED panel supporting Dolby Vision, HDR10 and HLG.
    • RTINGS.com โ€” positive: The set ships with Google TV version 14, which is fast and easy to use with no bugs found during testing; AIDA64 shows the MediaTek 1000 chipset, and the interface still carries ads.
    • TechRadar โ€” mixed: Google TV's large banner ads can be distracting and performance was solid but not as slick as on LG's TVs; Smart TV and menus score 4/5.
    • WIRED โ€” positive: Setup and installation were intuitive and Google TV is easy to use, with two USB ports, a coaxial input for antenna or cable and four HDMI ports on the rear panel.
Review Consensus ยท calculated by ReviewQuorum

Common criticisms

No criticism was shared by enough independent sources to count as consensus.

Split Verdict ยท calculated by ReviewQuorum

Where reviewers disagree

  • Picture quality ยท 5 positive, 1 negative, 6 mixed
    Which sources said this
    • HIFI.DE โ€” positive: Colours are more brilliant than on other TVs, image processing is excellent and blooming is not a big problem, though the relatively large dimming zones cost the Bravia 7 II a few points.
    • CHIP โ€” mixed: Black level and detail rendering could be better, as could the viewing angles; measured 99.6% DCI-P3, 91.3% BT.2020 and an acceptable viewing angle of 40 degrees horizontal and 31 vertical.
    • choose.tv โ€” positive: Scored 8/10 for contrast and black detail and 8.5/10 for tonal transitions; the True RGB backlight gives a wide colour gamut and improves viewing angles, which for a VA panel are really good.
    • Computer Bild โ€” positive: OLED-like contrast, very natural colours, even backlighting and outstanding local dimming are counted among the set's strengths against the original Bravia 7.
    • Computerworld (DK) โ€” mixed: A lovely picture with small flaws: the black areas are not quite as black, and it never becomes as impressive as the best OLED televisions, though True RGB manages the light well.
    • Digit โ€” positive: The TV produced uniform, deep blacks without any crushing, and the strong local dimming ensures there are no obvious haloing or blooming artefacts in Professional mode.
    • Frandroid โ€” positive: Blooming is less perceptible than on classic blue-LED backlights and absent head-on, contrasts are particularly deep on Mad Max: Fury Road and skin tones are accurate in Alpha.
    • Popular Mechanics โ€” mixed: Gorgeous visuals with accurate colors and deep contrast out of the box, but direct light reflections negatively impact the picture quality and glare resistance is the headline criticism.
    • RTINGS.com โ€” mixed: Black uniformity is excellent: the blacks are incredibly uniform with barely any cloudiness even with local dimming disabled, though the viewing angle is only mediocre.
    • TechRadar โ€” mixed: It has some of the picture issues that come with mini-LED, backlight blooming and weaker-than-OLED viewing angles; the review also lists a reflective screen and dirty screen effect.
    • The Verge โ€” mixed: The Bravia 7 II handles blooming well, but it is still an LCD display so it does not match OLED; test patterns showed colour crosstalk, a green rectangle subtly haloing into the space around it.
    • WIRED โ€” negative: During a demo reel test the colour quality and contrast were not great; mist over a white mountain did not look distinct and complexions looked too dark and vice versa.
  • HDR brightness ยท 8 positive, 2 negative, 2 mixed
    Which sources said this
    • HIFI.DE โ€” positive: In Heimkino mode Professional the 10% window measured around 1,970 candela per square metre, the Bravia 9 II reaches over 4,200, and the set covers close to 90% of BT.2020.
    • CHIP โ€” positive: Strong colours with high peak brightness make HDR content appealing, measured up to 2,085 cd/m2, although HDR quality is not perfect and the HDR10+ format is missing.
    • choose.tv โ€” positive: In the proper Professional viewing mode the panel measured about 2,000 nits of peak brightness, and HDR shows lots of highlights without losing detail; HDR effect quality scores 7.7/10.
    • Computer Bild โ€” negative: Only 840 cd/m2 in the accurate Professionell mode's 10% HDR window against 2,064 cd/m2 for the original Bravia 7, with 2,000 nits reachable only in the showroom mode.
    • Computerworld (DK) โ€” positive: The True RGB backlight gives higher brightness as well as more precise colour control, and the panel is praised for good brightness in a mixed viewing environment.
    • Digit โ€” positive: It touched 2,110 nits in 10% and 25% windows with max brightness and peak luminance settings, and black luminance was also excellent at 0.2 nits.
    • Frandroid โ€” positive: The tested 65-inch promises purer colours and high brightness, and the RGB backlight is presented as the reason HDR keeps its highlights without losing detail.
    • Popular Mechanics โ€” mixed: High peak brightness makes every scene look lifelike, yet the picture lost quite a bit of detail when the curtains were opened in a south-west-facing living room, especially in dark scenes.
    • RTINGS.com โ€” positive: Measured 1,939 cd/m2 in a 10% HDR window (sustained 1,883), 2,097 cd/m2 at 25%, 841 cd/m2 fullscreen and 953 cd/m2 on a real SDR scene: excellent peak brightness in HDR.
    • TechRadar โ€” mixed: Measured 1,114 nits on a 10% window in Filmmaker Mode and 829 nits fullscreen, rising to 1,295 nits in HDR Standard, behind the Samsung R95H at 1,977 and the LG C6 at 1,427.
    • The Verge โ€” positive: The Bravia 7 II is capable of 2,200 nits of brightness, which is plenty for an average living room and gives headroom over content mastered at 1,000 nits.
    • WIRED โ€” negative: Contrast and brightness are just average for this price, and Sony's picture-quality enhancements did not help a ton.
  • Gaming ยท 4 positive, 4 negative, 3 mixed
    Which sources said this
    • HIFI.DE โ€” negative: 4K gaming at up to 120 Hz is unfortunately only possible on two of the HDMI inputs; the panel runs 100 / 120 Hz with two HDMI 2.1 and two HDMI 2.0 ports.
    • CHIP โ€” mixed: Gaming-mode latency was measured at 11 ms at 1080p60 and the feature set is praised, but only two ports with HDMI 2.1 is listed as a drawback.
    • Computer Bild โ€” negative: Only two of the four HDMI sockets are HDMI 2.1, unchanged from the previous generation.
    • Computerworld (DK) โ€” positive: The panel can run up to 120 Hz and has a gaming mode, with variable refresh rate for a TV box, Apple TV, PlayStation or gaming PC.
    • Digit โ€” mixed: PS5 optimisations and XR motion clarity are present, but limited HDMI 2.1 connectivity and the lack of HDR10+ may deter some buyers.
    • Frandroid โ€” positive: The spec table confirms 120 Hz display frequency, VRR, ALLM, four HDMI ports of which two are HDMI 2.1, eARC and 40 W of audio with Dolby Atmos and DTS:X.
    • Popular Mechanics โ€” positive: Amazing performance as a PlayStation 5 monitor is a headline pro; the set has four HDMI ports of which two are HDMI 2.1 and is sold in six sizes from 50 to 98 inches.
    • RTINGS.com โ€” mixed: Excellent input lag across all supported modes as long as you are in Game Mode, with HDMI Forum VRR and G-SYNC compatibility, but limited to 120 Hz with HDMI 2.1 on two inputs and no FreeSync.
    • TechRadar โ€” positive: The Bravia 7 II produced a 10.4ms input lag time, one of the stronger times seen from a Sony TV, though only two HDMI 2.1 ports is listed as a reason to avoid.
    • The Verge โ€” negative: Only two 4K/120Hz HDMI inputs are listed among The Bad, although the set carries 4K/120Hz, ALLM and VRR with one HDMI 2.1 port also providing eARC.
    • WIRED โ€” negative: Only two of the four HDMI ports support HDMI 2.1, there is no DisplayPort and the highest refresh rate is 120 Hz for a connected PC, where the Hisense UR9 reaches 180 Hz.
  • Sound ยท 1 positive, 2 negative, 5 mixed
    Which sources said this
    • HIFI.DE โ€” mixed: The built-in sound highlights voices and is usable, but anyone wanting more bass foundation and home-cinema sound should add a sound system to the Bravia 7 II.
    • CHIP โ€” mixed: The sound is decent, but the measured Tonqualitaet sub-note is only Gut (2,2), the weakest of the four sub-scores against Bildqualitaet 1,6, Ausstattung 1,5 and power 1,0.
    • choose.tv โ€” negative: Sound quality scores 7.8/10, the lowest mark in the verdict summary, against 9.6/10 for apps and 9.0/10 for watching in bright light.
    • Computer Bild โ€” positive: Good sound and clear treble with decent bass are counted among the set's pros; no audio measurement is published.
    • Computerworld (DK) โ€” negative: The sound is surprisingly poor considering how many speakers are in the cabinet, so do not buy it without an external sound source.
    • Digit โ€” neutral: The total output is 40 watts; the speakers support Dolby Atmos and DTS:X along with 3D Surround Upscaling for virtual height effects and expanded stereo sound.
    • Frandroid โ€” mixed: The overall frequency response remains respectable with Voice Zoom 3 helping dialogue, but a dedicated soundbar is still recommended for a truly immersive experience.
    • RTINGS.com โ€” mixed: The frequency response on this TV is decent and it gets very loud, but voices become a bit drowned out by other sound effects at maximum volume.
    • TechRadar โ€” mixed: Solid sound quality overall when set up correctly, with good detail and accuracy, but the sound feels contained to the screen and can be harsh at times; Sound quality score 4/5.
  • Design and build ยท 4 positive, 1 negative, 4 mixed
    Which sources said this
    • HIFI.DE โ€” mixed: At a cabinet depth of 5.5 cm it is almost twice as thick as a Samsung QN90F mini-LED, in an otherwise straight-lined, elegant design with a central stand and cable routing.
    • CHIP โ€” positive: Measured 145 x 83 x 34 cm and 30.7 kg with a 5.5 cm panel; power consumption scores Sehr gut (1,0) at 69.2 W in SDR, 144.3 W in HDR and 0.3 W in standby.
    • Computerworld (DK) โ€” mixed: The frame around the TV is not particularly thin, but it is very nicely crafted and designed.
    • Frandroid โ€” positive: The supplied remote is strictly identical to the one shipped with the Bravia 9 II, with backlighting and a shortcut key, plus an optional second remote with numeric keys.
    • Popular Mechanics โ€” negative: No HDR10+ and only two HDMI 2.1 ports are the two hardware cons listed alongside the direct-light reflections that the review says require care over placement.
    • RTINGS.com โ€” positive: A very premium design with thin uniform bezels on all four sides, a centre pedestal whose lens panel hides cables, and fantastic build quality even though it is largely made of plastic.
    • TechRadar โ€” mixed: The set is bulkier and on the denser, deeper side in terms of scale, with a remote made of light plastic that the reviewer would have liked to see upgraded; Design score 4/5.
    • The Verge โ€” positive: The cool lenticular screen stand is one of only two items in The Good alongside the colour accuracy, and the review calls the television a statement piece.
    • WIRED โ€” mixed: The assembly process is a bit complicated since the legs come in different parts that do not fit together logically, and the transparent stand looks too foggy and is completely visible.
  • Value ยท 3 positive, 1 negative, 6 mixed
    Which sources said this
    • HIFI.DE โ€” positive: HIFI.DE scores it 9.2/10: the 65-inch lists at EUR 2,499 with street prices around EUR 2,300, and the shop module showed the 55-inch at EUR 1,699, the 65-inch at EUR 1,899 and the 75-inch at EUR 2,599.
    • CHIP โ€” mixed: Price assessment is Akzeptabel (2,8) as of 2026-10-09 and was Teuer (3,9) at test time, with the 65-inch at EUR 2,500 when tested and ranked 22nd of 61 televisions.
    • choose.tv โ€” positive: choose.tv rates the 75-inch 8.4/10 overall and 9.0/10 for watching in bright light, calling it a TV that shows RGB Mini-LED does not have to be reserved only for the wealthiest customers.
    • Computer Bild โ€” mixed: A worthy successor to the Bravia 7 that beats its predecessor on SDR brightness, natural colour and OLED-like contrast while trailing it on maximum HDR brightness.
    • Computerworld (DK) โ€” mixed: At a price of around DKK 22,000 for the 65-inch it is judged on all-round picture quality rather than on price, and it is explicitly not a substitute for the best OLEDs.
    • Digit โ€” mixed: At INR 210,890 for the 55-inch the high price may deter some buyers, yet its picture quality and the overall experience are enough to justify its premium positioning.
    • Frandroid โ€” mixed: Frandroid scores it Note finale du test 9/10: the Bravia 7 II must convince on versatility, high brightness and Sony's calibration rather than on an unbeatable price-performance ratio.
    • TechRadar โ€” positive: TechRadar scores it 4.5/5: launched at USD 2,599 / GBP 2,299 / AUD 3,299, about the price of the LG C6, and good overall value for money in the new RGB world.
    • The Verge โ€” mixed: Verge Score 8/10 with pricier than competitors in The Bad: $2,600 for the 65-inch at Sony and Best Buy and $3,100 for the 75-inch at Best Buy.
    • WIRED โ€” negative: WIRED scores it 6/10: expensive for a midrange television, at $2,600 list and $2,300 at Sony and Best Buy for the 65-inch, while the Bravia 9 II costs $3,600 at the same size.
Consensus by attribute ยท calculated by ReviewQuorum

Attribute by attribute

Picture quality ยท decisive
12 sources
HDR brightness ยท decisive
12 sources
Gaming ยท decisive
11 sources
Sound
8 sources
Smart TV platform
8 sources
Design and build
9 sources
Value
83/100 ยท scored by 6

Bars show how many independent sources were positive, mixed or negative. A number appears only when sources published a score for that attribute โ€” we never invent one.

Buyer Signal ยท not part of the Quorum Score

What buyers report

Best Buy (US): 4.7/5 average from 101 ratings ยท collected Oct 9, 2026
Sony - 65 inch Class BRAVIA 7 II True RGB 4K HDR Google TV with Gemini, the size most qualifying reviews tested. Rating and sample read on Best Buy's search page for K-65XR70M2; the product page itself timed out, then returned HTTP 403.
No star distribution and no verified-purchase flag are printed on the search page, so neither is recorded. Amazon US has no listing for the new model, so Buyer Signal rests on Best Buy alone. | Provenance: Best Buy search page (product page 403/timeout).
Best Buy (US): 4.8/5 average from 46 ratings ยท collected Oct 9, 2026
Sony - 75 inch Class BRAVIA 7 II True RGB 4K HDR Google TV with Gemini. Read on the same Best Buy search page as the 65-inch row, on 2026-10-09.
No star distribution or verified-purchase flag is printed. The 75-inch sample is less than half the 65-inch sample, so the two should not be averaged without saying so. | Provenance: Best Buy search page (product page 403/timeout).
Best Buy (US): 4.9/5 average from 52 ratings ยท collected Oct 9, 2026
Sony - 55 inch Class BRAVIA 7 II True RGB 4K HDR Google TV with Gemini, rated 4.9 from 52 reviews but shown as Unavailable on 2026-10-09, so this is a rating from a listing that could not be bought that day.
The 55-inch listing reads Unavailable while still showing a 4.9 rating from 52 reviews, so the sample is historical; no star distribution is printed. | Provenance: Best Buy search page (product page 403/timeout).
Creator Signal ยท not part of the Quorum Score

What creators showed

No creator content collected yet.

Editorial recommendation ยท derived from the sources

Best for

  • Bright rooms and daytime viewing. choose.tv scores it 9.0/10 for watching in bright light, RTINGS measured 953 cd/m2 on a real SDR scene, and Computer Bild and HIFI.DE both call it a bright-living-room set, with Digit and CHIP recording roughly 2,000 cd/m2 peaks.
  • Film and HDR viewers who want LCD brightness without burn-in risk. RTINGS, The Verge, HIFI.DE, Frandroid, Computer Bild and Digit all record OLED-like blacks in a dark room plus Dolby Vision, and RTINGS notes that LCD panels are immune to permanent burn-in.
  • PlayStation 5 and Xbox owners. Popular Mechanics calls its PS5 performance amazing, TechRadar measured 10.4 ms of input lag and CHIP 11 ms at 1080p60, and RTINGS, What Hi-Fi? and Frandroid all confirm 4K/120, VRR, ALLM and Dolby Vision gaming.
  • Buyers who want the True RGB backlight without the Bravia 9 II price. choose.tv says it shows RGB Mini-LED does not have to be reserved for the wealthiest customers, and HIFI.DE calls it a remarkable upgrade over the Bravia 7.
Editorial recommendation ยท derived from the sources

Skip it if

  • You watch off-axis or from a wide seating arrangement. CHIP measures an acceptable viewing angle of only 40 degrees horizontal and 31 degrees vertical, RTINGS calls the viewing angle mediocre, and TechRadar and HIFI.DE both flag it.
  • Your room has unavoidable direct light. RTINGS says the glossy coating does very little to reduce direct reflections, TechRadar lists a reflective screen, and Popular Mechanics puts glare in its headline after losing dark-scene detail behind opened curtains.
  • You want the cheapest route to OLED-grade black. What Hi-Fi?, TechRadar and WIRED all say cheaper OLEDs beat it on contrast, and What Hi-Fi? notes the 55-inch is priced above the LG C6.
  • Your room is too dark and you expect OLED motion. RTINGS measured disappointing 120 Hz response times and bad 60 Hz transitions, and its review calls fast motion blurry.
Important caveats.
  • HDR brightness is mode-dependent by more than a factor of two: 840 cd/m2 (Computer Bild, accurate mode, 10% window), 1,114 nits (TechRadar, Filmmaker Mode), 1,939 cd/m2 (RTINGS, 10% window), about 1,970 cd/m2 (HIFI.DE), 2,085 cd/m2 (CHIP, maximum) and 2,110 nits (Digit, max settings), with RTINGS measuring only 841 cd/m2 fullscreen.
  • Only two of the four HDMI inputs are HDMI 2.1 and the panel tops out at 120 Hz with no DisplayPort; RTINGS, WIRED, The Verge, TechRadar, CHIP, Computer Bild, Digit, Popular Mechanics and Frandroid all record it, and WIRED notes the Hisense UR9 reaches 180 Hz.
  • Viewing angles and reflections are the set's weakest traits: CHIP measures 40 degrees horizontal and 31 degrees vertical, RTINGS calls the angle mediocre with a glossy coating, TechRadar lists a reflective screen and dirty screen effect, and Popular Mechanics makes glare its headline criticism.
  • The integrated sound is the corpus's least contested weakness: What Hi-Fi? calls it disappointingly dull, Computerworld DK calls it surprisingly poor and says do not buy the set without an external sound source, CHIP scores Tonqualitat only Gut (2,2) and choose.tv gives sound 7.8/10, its lowest mark.
  • A live firmware defect is documented: RTINGS' 2026-09-09 update records intermittent LPCM-over-ARC desync on Sony TVs with the MediaTek Pentonic 1000 chipset on Android 14, about 438 ms after 20 minutes on the Bravia 7 II, reproducible with the internal speakers, and HDTVTest reports Sony rolling out firmware to fix Dolby Vision HDR and audio-sync issues.
  • HDR10+ is missing on a 2026 set: CHIP, Computer Bild, Digit and Popular Mechanics all record its absence, while Dolby Vision is present.
  • Value is genuinely split rather than settled: choose.tv 8.4/10, HIFI.DE 9.2/10, Frandroid 9/10 and TechRadar 4.5/5 against WIRED's 6/10, which calls contrast and brightness just average for the price, with What Hi-Fi? saying the set cannot rival cheaper OLEDs.
  • The most measurement-heavy source contributes no number: RTINGS' per-test figures are paywalled and its own 8.4 has no scale printed on any page read, so it stays out of the Quorum Score, and AVForums, Trusted Reviews, FlatpanelsHD and every Sony first-party page returned HTTP 403.
  • The launch price has already moved in both directions: TechRadar records $2,599 / 2,299 GBP at launch while Best Buy US listed the 65-inch at $1,799.99 and the 75-inch at $2,299.99 on 2026-10-09, with the 55-inch unavailable.
  • The Bravia 7 II and the step-up Bravia 9 II share the same True RGB technology but not the same panel: HIFI.DE reports a cut-down RGB implementation and a different LCD panel in the 7 II, and Computer Bild measured a large drop in maximum HDR brightness against the original Bravia 7.

Alternatives

ProductQuorum ScoreConfidenceNote
LG C6 OLED 90/100 Low The OLED the reviews benchmark the Bravia 7 II against: What Hi-Fi?, TechRadar and WIRED all say the cheaper C6 wins on contrast, and TechRadar measured 1,114 nits for the Sony against 1,427 for the C6 on a 10% HDR window. Compare
Samsung R95H Micro RGB 75/100 Low The other 2026 RGB Mini LED set in the quorum: TechRadar's own comparison table measured 1,977 nits for the Samsung R95H against 1,114 for the Bravia 7 II on a 10% HDR window, and both sit below a brighter flagship. Compare

Sources analyzed

PublicationTypePublishedOriginalNormalizedStatusReview
choose.tv
by Maciej Koper, Pawel Koper and Michal Woloszyn
Product provided by the brand
Full review Sep 15, 2026 8.4/10 84/100 Counted Read โ†—
TechRadar
by James Davidson
Product provided by the brand
Full review Aug 30, 2026 4.5/5 90/100 Counted ยท averaged within its group Read โ†—
Popular Mechanics
by Stefan Vazharov
Product provided by the brand
Full review Aug 28, 2026 No score โ€” Counted Read โ†—
CHIP
by Thorsten Nowag
Product provided by the brand
Full review Jul 27, 2026 Testurteil Gut (1,6) (German school scale, lower is better; not converted to 0-100) โ€” Counted Read โ†—
Computerworld (DK)
by Peter Hyldahl
Product provided by the brand
Full review Jul 20, 2026 No score โ€” Counted Read โ†—
What Hi-Fi?
by Lewis Empson
Product provided by the brand
Full review Jul 10, 2026 4/5 80/100 Counted ยท averaged within its group Read โ†—
RTINGS.com Full review Jul 7, 2026 No score โ€” Counted Read โ†—
WIRED
by John Brandon
Product provided by the brand
Full review Jul 6, 2026 6/10 60/100 Counted Read โ†—
Computer Bild
by Dennis Ellenberger
Product provided by the brand
Full review Jul 1, 2026 Testnote 1,7 gut (German school scale, lower is better; not converted to 0-100) โ€” Counted Read โ†—
Digit
by G. S. Vasan
Product provided by the brand
Full review Jun 26, 2026 No score โ€” Counted Read โ†—
The Verge
by John Higgins
Product provided by the brand
Full review May 27, 2026 8/10 80/100 Counted Read โ†—
HIFI.DE
Product provided by the brand
Full review โ€” 9.2/10 92/100 Counted Read โ†—
Frandroid
Product provided by the brand
Full review โ€” 9/10 90/100 Counted Read โ†—

Summaries are ours; read each original review for its full context. Normalized = the original score converted to 0โ€“100.

How we reached this verdict

13 full professional reviews qualified, representing 12 independent editorial groups, published between May 2026 and Sep 2026. Each group counts once and weighs the same; when a group has several titles, their scores are averaged into one. Scores were converted linearly to a 0โ€“100 scale, and the number rests on the 6 groups that publish one; reviews without a score inform the consensus but not the number. Buyer and creator signals are shown separately and are not averaged into the Quorum Score. Research cut-off: Oct 9, 2026. Methodology 1.1. Main limitation: only 6 of 12 independent groups publish a numeric score. Read the methodology.

Where to buy

We may earn a commission when you buy through links on this page. This does not affect our scores or editorial conclusions. How we make money.

US
Best Buy
Out of stock ยท checked Oct 9, 2026
$1,699.99
Sale price
Check price at Best Buy
Best Buy
In stock ยท checked Oct 9, 2026
$1,799.99
Sale price
Check price at Best Buy
Best Buy
In stock ยท checked Oct 9, 2026
$2,299.99
Sale price
Check price at Best Buy

* Affiliate link. Prices and stock change quickly; the date shows when we last checked.

Product facts ยท according to the manufacturer

Specifications

Sony's 2026 mid-range True RGB television, announced in late May 2026 and reviewed from 27 May 2026 onwards. It is the step-down model below the Bravia 9 II and replaces the 2024 Bravia 7. Instead of a blue backlight with a quantum-dot film it drives separate red, green and blue LEDs in each zone, which Sony markets as True RGB; every publication read confirms that this technology applies to the Bravia 7 II itself and not only to the flagship. It runs a VA LCD at a native 120 Hz with Google TV 14 on the MediaTek Pentonic 1000 chipset, supports Dolby Vision but not HDR10+, carries two HDMI 2.1 inputs of four, and produces 40 W of 2.0-channel Dolby Atmos and DTS:X audio. US launch prices read were $1,600 / $2,100 / $2,600 / $3,100 / $4,000 / $9,000 for 50 to 100 inches; on 2026-10-09 Best Buy US sold the 65-inch at $1,799.99 and the 75-inch at $2,299.99. Reviewers agree on the backlight and split on value, viewing angles and sound.

Manufacturer specifications
PanelVA LCD with an RGB Mini LED (True RGB) backlight; RTINGS: 'Panel Type LCD', 'Sub-Type VA', 'uses a new RGB Mini LED panel'
Resolution3840 x 2160 (4K)
Native refresh rate120 Hz (RTINGS, CHIP, choose.tv, Frandroid, Computerworld DK)
Sizes50, 55, 65, 75, 85 and 98 inches per RTINGS; What Hi-Fi?'s price table lists 50, 55, 65, 75, 85 and 100 inches, so the 98 vs 100 inch naming is NOT CONFIRMED
ProcessorSony XR Processor with AI upscaling (RTINGS, Digit, Computerworld DK)
Smart platformGoogle TV 14 on the MediaTek Pentonic 1000 chipset (RTINGS, from its own AIDA64 read-out)
HDR formatsHDR10, HLG and Dolby Vision; HDR10+ is absent (CHIP, Computer Bild, Digit, Popular Mechanics)
Audio2.0 channels, 40 W, Dolby Atmos and DTS:X with 3D Surround Upscaling (Frandroid spec table, Digit)
HDMI4 inputs, of which 2 are HDMI 2.1 (48 Gbps); one high-bandwidth port also carries eARC (RTINGS, What Hi-Fi?, Frandroid)
Other connections2 x USB, optical audio out, Ethernet, Wi-Fi 6E, Apple AirPlay 2, Google Chromecast (Popular Mechanics, RTINGS)
Tuner2 x cable, 2 x satellite and 2 x DVB-T2 tuners; ATSC 3.0 on US models (CHIP, RTINGS, What Hi-Fi?)
StandCentre pedestal with the True RGB series' semi-opaque lenticular panel that hides cables routed through the back (RTINGS, What Hi-Fi?, WIRED, HIFI.DE, choose.tv)
Dimensions and weight (65-inch)145 x 83 x 34 cm and 30.7 kg; panel thickness 5.5 cm (CHIP, HIFI.DE)
Power consumption (65-inch)69.2 W in SDR, 144.3 W in HDR, 0.3 W standby; CHIP's power sub-score is Sehr gut (1,0)
Measured HDR brightness1,939 cd/m2 in a 10% window and 841 cd/m2 fullscreen (RTINGS); about 1,970 cd/m2 in a 10% window (HIFI.DE); 1,114 nits in Filmmaker Mode and 1,295 nits in HDR Standard (TechRadar); 840 cd/m2 in the accurate mode (Computer Bild); 2,110 nits at max settings (Digit); 2,200 nits claimed (The Verge)
Measured colour99.6% DCI-P3 and 91.3% BT.2020 (CHIP); about 90% BT.2020 (HIFI.DE); 87.93% BT.2020 in RGB mode against 71% in white-backlight mode (TechTimes, reporting Tom's Guide)
Launch priceUSD 1,600 / 2,100 / 2,600 / 3,100 / 4,000 / 9,000 for 50, 55, 65, 75, 85 and 100 inches; GBP 1,899 / 1,999 / 2,299 / 2,999 / 3,999 / 6,999; EUR 2,499 UVP for the 65-inch; INR 210,890 for the 55-inch

Manufacturer page โ†—

Update history

  1. ยท Verdict published โ€” Verdict published: 13 qualifying reviews from 12 independent groups.